ZENTORY Protocol: What Evidence Would Move It Beyond “Watch-Only”?

I reviewed ZENTORY Protocol with my squad as part of a pre-TGE research dossier. The architecture is interesting: ERC-4626 vaults are combined with a public quant-signal registry. But for me, the key question is not whether the design is promising — it is whether live execution can demonstrate repeatable net performance against simply holding the underlying asset. Based on the current public materials, ZENTORY remains testnet-only with mock assets and no real deposits, while meaningful yield has not yet been demonstrated. Four things would change my view:

1. A public external audit + remediation status
2. Deployment and admin/multisig controls verifiable on-chain
3. A timestamped live performance record
4. A reproducible comparison vs. holding, including fees, gas, slippage and drawdown Until those are independently checkable, I think “watch-only” is the appropriate research stance rather than making assumptions from the roadmap alone. What evidence would you consider most important before increasing conviction in a pre-TGE protocol like this? Sources: ZENTORY FAQ, Terms of Service and public protocol repository. This is due diligence discussion, not financial advice.