Project Research Dossier — ClawChain (CLAW)

Research question: Does ClawChain show enough verifiable product progress and sufficiently conservative token distribution to justify deeper diligence before launch? Project overview: ClawChain is a Substrate-based Layer 1 designed for autonomous AI-agent economies. Tokenomics: The stated supply is 1B CLAW. The documented allocation is:

• 40% Community
• 30% Validator rewards
• 20% Treasury
• 10% Founding contributors Community allocation: 25% immediate, remaining 75% linear over 12 months. Treasury: 10% immediate, remaining 90% over 24 months. Founding contributors: 6-month cliff followed by 24-month linear vesting. FDV can't be meaningfully calculated before there is a verified token price. Dilution: Based on the documented schedule, at least 100M community tokens + 20M treasury tokens appear available immediately. Another 300M community tokens then unlock linearly over 12 months and 180M treasury tokens over 24 months. Team/code: The project has an open-source repository with node/runtime code, chain specifications, custom pallets and SDKs. Main risks:

1. Concentrated contributor/team structure.
2. I couldn't verify an independent third-party protocol audit from the project's primary materials.
3. Exact launch circulating supply needs clarification.
4. The relationship between the stated 1B supply and ongoing inflation/emissions needs clarification. Conclusion: For me this is a watchlist / deeper-diligence project, rather than something I'd form investment conviction on yet. The public codebase and testnet are positive signals, but I'd want to see an independent security auditЮ Disclosure: We currently have no position in CLAW and received no compensation from ClawChain. This research was produced by dendi4 & mr.jayden0053 for a Republic/Legion campaign that may award participation rewards. Primary sources: ClawChain repository: github.com/clawinfra/claw-chain